+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

What survey data and election results can tell us about voter suppression

Who loses votes? Can this bias election outcomes?

G. Elliott Morris
Data journalist
The Economist

October 22, 2020
Prepared for a guest lecture to Bryan Jones’s class, UT Austin

1 / 19

What if everyone voted?

2 / 19

Guiding questions

3 / 19

Guiding questions

1. How many Democrats and Republicans are there?

Given data constraints, we're really asking: How many Clinton and Trump voters are there?

3 / 19

Guiding questions

1. How many Democrats and Republicans are there?

Given data constraints, we're really asking: How many Clinton and Trump voters are there?

2. How are they distributed geographically?

The answer lets us assign Electoral College votes.

3 / 19

Data

4 / 19

Data

1. Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES): A survey of 64,000 Americans

Includes demographic data and 2016 vote choice for 40,000+ validated voters

4 / 19

Data

1. Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES): A survey of 64,000 Americans

Includes demographic data and 2016 vote choice for 40,000+ validated voters

2. American Community Survey (ACS): A Census Bureau survey of 175,000 Americans

Includes the same demographic data as the CCES 32,640 “cells”

4 / 19

Method

5 / 19

Method

1. Train a predictive model on CCES data

  • Multi-level logistic regression
  • Predict vote choice with: age, gender, race, education, region and interactions between them
5 / 19

Method

1. Train a predictive model on CCES data

  • Multi-level logistic regression
  • Predict vote choice with: age, gender, race, education, region and interactions between them

2. Use the model to predict voting habits for every eligible American

Via “post-stratification” on the ACS

5 / 19

ACS Post-stratification

6 / 19

ACS Post-stratification

1. Each "cell" (row) is one "type" of person

  • One cell for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • Another for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the South
  • Another for non-white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • etc.
6 / 19

ACS Post-stratification

1. Each "cell" (row) is one "type" of person

  • One cell for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • Another for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the South
  • Another for non-white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • etc.

2. We know how many voters in that "cell" live in each state

6 / 19

ACS Post-stratification

1. Each "cell" (row) is one "type" of person

  • One cell for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • Another for white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the South
  • Another for non-white men ages 18-30 without college degrees who live in the Northeast
  • etc.

2. We know how many voters in that "cell" live in each state

3. So we can say that x and y% of each "cell" vote for Clinton or Trump, then add up

  • For example, a Latino female age 18-30 with a college degree in Texas is 85% likely to vote for a Democrat for president (White man 65+ is 80% Republican)
6 / 19

Results

7 / 19

Results

8 / 19

Results: If everyone voted

9 / 19

What does this tell us about voter suppression?

10 / 19

Voter suppression

11 / 19

Voter suppression

- We can modify the percentage of each group that turns out to vote, then re-predict the election

  • What if only all whites vote?
  • All non-whites?
  • Whites without degrees? Etc.
11 / 19

Voter suppression

- We can modify the percentage of each group that turns out to vote, then re-predict the election

  • What if only all whites vote?
  • All non-whites?
  • Whites without degrees? Etc.

- Democrats do better when non-whites turnout; Republicans have a vested interest in keeping turnout rates low

  • Especially in southern states with large minority populations
  • Or on college campuses
11 / 19

Suppression of whites votes

12 / 19

Suppression of POC votes

13 / 19

Considerations

14 / 19

Considerations

What this doesn’t tell us:

  • That Clinton/Trump/etc would have won if certain x, y or z restrictions had been put in place
  • Downstream effects (AKA party positions and coalition changes)
14 / 19

Considerations

What this doesn’t tell us:

  • That Clinton/Trump/etc would have won if certain x, y or z restrictions had been put in place
  • Downstream effects (AKA party positions and coalition changes)

The balancing act:

  • There are a ton of white, non-college educated voters in the Midwest that tilt national scales if we increase turnout
    • Especially because increases in turnout are not uniform
    • And because of their geographic distribution, small relative increases in white turnout can tip the Electoral College to Republicans (see: 2016)
    • But on the other hand, some organizations are explicitly targeting non-whites and young voters for turnout purposes
14 / 19

Application to 2020

15 / 19

Application to 2020

16 / 19

Application to 2020

1. Use YouGov data and MRP for turnout, vote choice, and vote method

2. Train models on NC ballot rejections to predict rejection likelihood

3. Calculate vote rejections for all absentee votes

4. Tally up lost votes for each party

16 / 19

Model NC rejection rates

17 / 19

Calculate partisan impact

18 / 19

Thank you!



Website: gelliottmorris.com

Email: elliott@thecrosstab.com

Twitter: @gelliottmorris




These slides were made with the xaringan package for R from Yihui Xie. They are available online at https://www.gelliottmorris.com/slides/2020-10-22-ut-austin/

19 / 19

What if everyone voted?

2 / 19
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow